Comments on: JQuery, Prototype, and MooTools Benchmark – SlickSpeed

By: morz

morz — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:23:33 +0000

I tried Prototype, JQuery, and mootool . So my winner is mootool. Simple, easy, and fast to learn. My new project (http://quickmessageapp.com) base on mootool

By: munna

munna — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:19:17 +0000

I would like to build a javascript in default.ctp
What is the process?

By: Juan García

Juan García — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:35:27 +0000

Do you guys know when they will update slickspeed libraries to the latest versions?
At least updating to jQuery-1.3.2 will show clearly the winner.

By: Kevin Lloyd

Kevin Lloyd — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:58:41 +0000

Make sure you test under all browsers, as certain functions are faster on different browsers. Just did a test on Safari 4 (OS X) and Prototype is, by far, the slowest.
Dojo was blazing, with Mootools and jQuery coming in a close second.

By: incremen

incremen — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:30:10 +0000

tried the test and seems that Prototype is a much faster framework. I’m currently using both jquery and mootools but it seems Prototype has it’s good point’s I might give it a try also.

Anyways… great article…

By: choncon

choncon — Wed, 27 May 2009 15:50:12 +0000

try with me
http://owljs.org/speed/

By: Ben

Ben — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:42:37 +0000

Well, why would I choose between say, Last.fm and Deezer.com? They basically do the same thing – they both play music – but not exactly in the same way (one is running smart radios, and the other plays on demand…)

Depending on my needs, I pick the one or the other : they also share the fact they’re free and easy to use!

If you know Javascript, you can learn those libraries in no time, but with little energy I admit. You can even use them on the same web pages, cause they’re not in conflict, they are all just awesome, and getting awesomer by the time I’m writing this.

PS : awesome blog

Ben’s last blog post..“Nous avons été visités” affirme un astronaute célèbre

By: anujtenani

anujtenani — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:40:06 +0000

Hey what about the plugins , userbase/support , ease of coding of each framework ??

By: First Carnival of Tech — Technology Matter

First Carnival of Tech — Technology Matter — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:22:01 +0000

[...] Old presents JQuery, Prototype, and MooTools Benchmark – SlickSpeed posted at Web Development 2.0: Web Design, CakePHP, Web [...]

By: Peter Velichkov

Peter Velichkov — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:17:56 +0000

I did a speed comparison with slickspeed under various browsers and OSs

http://blog.creonfx.com/javascript/dojo-vs-jquery-vs-mootools-vs-prototype-performance-comparison

By: Shanx

Shanx — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:20:44 +0000

Mootools rocks, every time, in every browser. I love their code, the way their website shows demos upfront.

Try getting that on jQuery’s website. And jQuery is usually the slowest on every browser for me. Their demos are very hard to come by.

Here’s an example of the box functions:

Moo: http://www.digitalia.be/software/slimbox
jQ: http://jquery.com/demo/thickbox/
Proto: http://www.huddletogether.com/projects/lightbox2/

The “SlimBox” with Mootools framework is easily the smallest of them all. Read the Features section on Slimbox page for a comparison with Prototype/Scriptaculous based thing.

By: Carnival of Tech News, Eleventh Edition - Just Linux

Carnival of Tech News, Eleventh Edition - Just Linux — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:27:12 +0000

[...] Old presents JQuery, Prototype, and MooTools Benchmark – SlickSpeed posted at Web Development 2.0: Web Design, CakePHP, Web [...]

By: bennie

bennie — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:06:16 +0000

Hi, Your article was accepted in the First Carnival of Tech at http://www.technologymatter.com/2008/02/first-carnival-of-tech.html
Please vote for it on social bookmarking sites or comment about it in your blog!

Thanks!

By: My E-Commerce

My E-Commerce — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:24:04 +0000

Electronic Commerce – Blog Carnival (4th February…

Welcome to the February 4, 2008 edition of electronic commerce. (Vol 2, No. 3, 2008)…

By: Baz L

Baz L — Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:49:32 +0000

Hey I’m with you on that one, but many people use that as a deal breaker when choosing a javascript framework.

By: Dennison Uy - Graphic Designer

Dennison Uy - Graphic Designer — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:22:19 +0000

You mean the unnoticeable few millisecond delay when using jQuery on Firefox? Yeah, like that’s a real big deal breaker huh?

By: Lulugal11

Lulugal11 — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:25:35 +0000

Well since I love Firefox so much and do not even use Internet Explorer any more I guess I will not get the benefits of JQuery.